Maya had the dream life. Maya became the victim of emotional and verbal abuse, first from her mother in law, then her extended family members, and then ultimately from her husband.

The walls came crashing down upon Maya, when her mother in law crossed the line to not only verbally and emotionally abuse her, she repeatedly hurt her infant son too. The saddest thing about this situation, is that her mother in law “did not intentionally” verbally and emotionally abuse anyone. Maya’s then 2 month old son, was quivering in her arms with fear.

Maya’s son suffered from the most intense “colic” at that time.

During this time, Maya’s husband refused to see the connection between Maya’s mother in law’s abusive behavior and the grandchild’s sickness.

Interestingly, after Maya’s son was removed from Maya’s mother in law’s house, all the extreme physical symptoms Maya’s son had disappeared. In Maya’s case, Maya’s mother in law had a pattern of abusively force feeding babies. This lady actually tried to force feed Maya’s son in her home while Maya was on a business call. Fortunately, Maya was present and able to intervene. The lady never took responsibility for her abusive behavior with Maya’s son. And interestingly, the entire family, Maya’s father-in-law and husband tried to emotionally and verbally attack Maya in defense of this sick behavior.

Mother In Law Abuse – What You Can Do About It

The Castle Law is one of the most interesting Self-Defense laws that exists in the United States but is largely derived from the English Common Law. Not all the states support the Castle Doctrine. At first the occupants of the house must be in the house legally.

Maya had the dream life.

During this time, Maya’s husband refused to see the connection between Maya’s mother in law’s abusive behavior and the grandchild’s sickness.

Interestingly, after Maya’s son was removed from Maya’s mother in law’s house, all the extreme physical symptoms Maya’s son had disappeared. In Maya’s case, Maya’s mother in law had a pattern of abusively force feeding babies.

Mother In Law Abuse – What You Can Do About It

IMPERATIVE OR AUSTIN’S THEORY OF LAW:Austin says that law is a command which obliges a person or persons to a course of conduct. FEATURES OF IMPERATIVE THEORY:According to Austin, positive law has three main features:I.; CommandII. >Characteristics of Sovereign: (i) Source of Laws:Sovereign is the source of law. Every law is set, by a sovereign persons or body of persons. SANCTION:The term sanction is derived from Roman Law. CRITICISM:Austin’s theory of law has been criticized on many grounds. A state enforces it because it is already law. (ii) Gunman Law:Some have criticized the positivist theory of law as a theory of gunman, as it makes no real distinction between a law and the command of a bank-robber who points his gun at the bank clerk and orders him to give him money.Reply:This criticism over looks Austin’s second requirement of law which requires that only that command is law which is given by political superior or sovereign.(iii) Generality of Law:According to Austin, law is a general rule of conduct, but that is not practicable in every sphere of law. It disregards the moral or ethical elements in law.(xi) Not applicable to International Law:Austin’s definition of law cannot be applied to International law that is to say that International Law is not an imperative law. The International law is not the command of any sovereign, yet it is considered to be law by all concerned. (xii) Not Applicable to constitutional law:Austin’s definition of law does not apply to constitutional law which cannot to called commands of any sovereign. IS MORAL LAW IMPERATIVE:Moral law has also been called the divine law, the law of reason, the universal or common law or eternal law. Natural law appeals to the reason of men. Natural or moral law exists only in an ideal state and differs from positive law of state. In Austin view of law morality altogether ignores therefore moral law is not an imperative law.6.

Related Post: